Do we have the right to bear arms, but only if they are from designated manufacturers? It might seem so in this tidbit we found in an online search. Who woulda thunk that an individual creating a sculpture with a firing mechanism would have come under such scrutiny. Maybe next time keep those "sculptures" out of the public view and more specifically out of museums where the wine and cheese pc crowd won't be so offended.
 |
| Homemade Shotgun "sculpture" created by Chad Person |
Last week, the lengthy (and undoubtedly expensive) investigation was closed. While I held my breath, ATF engineers spent months - or maybe just a day - attempting to fire a standard 12 gauge round through my improvised shotgun sculpture. In the end, they met with success.
While I have yet to see any evidence that the sculpture was successfully weaponized, the BATFE has informed me that they have classified my sculpture as a firearm, placing it within jurisdiction of the infamous Gun Control Act (GCA). Hence it would appear that, the act of making the sculpture and my transference of said sculpture to art gallery in Los Angeles was illegal.
 |
| The Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms paid a visit to Chad Person |
Is it illegal to manufacture firearms and traffic them across state lines without proper permits, etc.? You bet it is; and I would highly recommend that you do not try this at home. However, given the context of my unique situation a decision was made to pass on enforcement of the crimes I allegedly committed. (I continue to maintain that there was no actual crime.)
In an earlier post I remarked that questioning, researching and debating the laws we are forced to live by is the very essence of a democratic state. As an artist, I routinely push against boundaries, conventions, and in this instance, the GCA, in order to ask difficult questions about my life and the world around me. My art is speech, and my speech is protected. I can only assume that this was the rationale that led the ATF to issue me (in person) a cease and desist and take no further action.
This
simultaneous vilification and vindication has been nothing short of
inspirational. I am proud of the ATF for making what I believe is a
sensible call, and thankful to not be engaged in a lengthy legal battle
over the nature of my work. Whereas I am disheartened to lose the
sculpture, since the BATFE has refused to return it to me, I will be
writing it off as an unrecoverable business loss in 2012. On a very personal note, I feel a renewed sense of purpose and faith in my work. This experience has reaffirmed that by continuing to ask questions and following my ideas to their natural end - regardless of difficulty or intimidation - I will inevitably find moments of truth and beauty.
*I am continuing to seek hard evidence (photographic/video) that the sculpture in question was successfully weaponized in the BATFE lab. If/when I obtain this, I will post a follow up.*
In the meantime, I would like to remind anyone reading this post to read the disclaimers on my Project Statement Page and do your own research before undertaking any actions that may be dangerous or illegal where you reside."
