Do we have the right to bear arms, but only if they are from designated manufacturers? It might seem so in this tidbit we found in an online search. Who woulda thunk that an individual creating a sculpture with a firing mechanism would have come under such scrutiny. Maybe next time keep those "sculptures" out of the public view and more specifically out of museums where the wine and cheese pc crowd won't be so offended.
 |
| Homemade Shotgun "sculpture" created by Chad Person |
"Five months ago one of my sculptures was seized by the ATF. Agents visited my art dealer
with orders to confiscate "Improvised Shotgun - White" following a
citizen complaint. The citizen/agency questioned the legality of the
manufacturing and trafficking of the alleged weapon.
Last week, the lengthy (and undoubtedly expensive)
investigation was closed. While I held my breath, ATF engineers spent
months - or maybe just a day - attempting to fire a standard 12 gauge
round through my improvised shotgun sculpture. In the end, they met with
success.
While I have yet to see any evidence that the
sculpture was successfully weaponized, the BATFE has informed me that
they have classified my sculpture as a firearm, placing it within
jurisdiction of the infamous Gun Control Act (GCA).
Hence it would appear that, the act of making the sculpture and my
transference of said sculpture to art gallery in Los Angeles was
illegal.
 |
| The Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms paid a visit to Chad Person |
As
outlined by the letter you see here (click to enlarge), the ATF
considers my actions "unlawful manufacture and transfer of firearms"
which carry the penalty of "imprisonment for not more than 5 years
and/or a fine of up to $250,000." So, why am I not in jail? In a word;
context. I am not an arms manufacturer, nor am I an arms trafficker - I
am an artist. Fortunately, the ATF appears to agree.
Is it
illegal to manufacture firearms and traffic them across state lines
without proper permits, etc.? You bet it is; and I would highly
recommend that you do not try this at home.
However, given the context of my unique situation a decision was made
to pass on enforcement of the crimes I allegedly committed. (I continue to maintain that there was no actual crime.)
In
an earlier post I remarked that questioning, researching and debating
the laws we are forced to live by
is the very essence of a democratic state. As an artist, I routinely
push against boundaries, conventions, and in
this instance, the GCA, in order to ask difficult questions about my
life
and the world around me. My art is speech, and my speech is protected. I
can only assume that this was the rationale that led the ATF to issue
me (in person) a cease and desist and take no further action.
This
simultaneous vilification and vindication has been nothing short of
inspirational. I am proud of the ATF for making what I believe is a
sensible call, and thankful to not be engaged in a lengthy legal battle
over the nature of my work. Whereas I am disheartened to lose the
sculpture, since the BATFE has refused to return it to me, I will be
writing it off as an unrecoverable business loss in 2012.
On a very personal note,
I feel a renewed sense of purpose and faith in my work. This experience
has reaffirmed that by
continuing to ask questions and following my ideas to their natural end -
regardless of difficulty or intimidation - I will inevitably find
moments of truth and beauty.
*I am continuing to seek hard
evidence (photographic/video) that the sculpture in question was
successfully weaponized in the BATFE lab. If/when I obtain this, I will
post a follow up.*
In the meantime, I would like to remind anyone reading this post to read the disclaimers on my Project Statement Page and do your own research before undertaking any actions that may be dangerous or illegal where you reside."
